|
A
Quieter Modification of the
|
My
Experience. When I first contacted Kolak
about an exhaust I
explained that I wasn't young anymore and I did not want a loud system. Kolak
recommended that I
go with a
"stealthier" MagnaFlow muffler rather than one of the Flowmasters he
typically
supplies.
He provided a system consisting of his custom tail
pipe, a MagnaFlow
12289 24" case muffler and MagnaFlow 94009 high flow
catalytic
converter. I still found this
system to
be too loud, particularly the drone at expressway cruising
speeds (1,700 - 2,200 RPM). There was also cabin interior
resonance (a "beating" sensation I could feel on my ear drums)
around 1,600-1,700 RPM. Kolak's response was that most customers
are happy with
the sound level of his systems, but that sometimes variations in the
installation
might cause drone. He also mentioned that the
early 49-state-emission
WJs
without pre-cats do tend to be louder. In an attempt to address my
issue he replaced the catalytic
converter with a larger MagnaFlow model 94409 which includes a
resonator. The new converter did quiet the system somewhat but there
was still annoying drone at highway cruising speeds. Still
dissatisfied, I had the system completely reinstalled by
a different exhaust shop, one with a top-notch reputation for custom
work. My hope was that a better
installation might correct any
other
issues contributing to the drone. I also had the MagnaFlow
muffler
swapped for a Walker Quiet Flow model 21054 - the
quietest muffler I
could
find which would fit and still provide good flow with the 3 inch pipes.
This
system
was significantly quieter overall but there was
still obnoxious
drone, though now it was at 1,500 -
2,000 RPM. These changes had moved the drone downward about
200 RPM, trading some of the cruising drone for still
annoying
around-town drone. Finally,
after
spending a lot more time researching the cause and possible
cures of exhaust
drone, I had my shop
fabricate and install
a side
branch resonator. I tried to tune the resonator length
close to the center of my drone
band, but leaning a little toward the upper RPM. I
was really pleased when the new resonator actually eliminated nearly
all drone. It seemed almost
magical. Only a slight drone remains right at 1,500 RPM. Perhaps that
could
also have been eliminated if the resonator length had
been tuned to work
best at
slightly
lower RPM, but when I was considering the tuning
I wanted to
be certain to cover all cruising RPM drone and I wasn't sure
whether one resonator could cover the entire range from 1,500 to 2,000
RPM. In view of this choice
I am really
happy it worked as well as it did over almost the entire band. The
exhaust is
now far
quieter than before. The overall sound is
comparable to a
fairly subtle original equipment high performance
or heavy duty truck exhaust. It's not as
deep, throaty
and loud
as typical aftermarket performance systems, but there is considerably
more V8
character than with the stock exhaust. Most
side branch resonator installations I've seen on the internet have been
mounted on the
tailpipe. However there is limited space under
this vehicle, especially
with a
24" muffler attached directly to the tailpipe, so the resonator had to
be attached in
front of the
muffler and routed along the inboard side between the muffler
and driveshaft. There is enough room there because the Quiet
Flow muffler is relatively narrow and also has an
offset
inlet and center
outlet (opposite of the Kolak and original equipment setup). That
configuration shifts
the casing away from the driveshaft providing more room on the
inboard side. It might be
possible to install a side branch with a wider muffler mounted
in the stock position, but that would
likely
require some clever pipe bending to fit in the
limited available
space. One additional consideration with placing the resonator in front of the muffler is that the temperature there is probably a little higher than it would be at the tailpipe. This would increase the speed of sound within the resonator. Which means the tuning length needs to be a bit longer to function at the intended frequency. Based on some later calculations, it appears that ~½" to 1" longer tuning might possibly have worked better for hitting the center of my drone band. This assumes a resonator temperature of 165° F rather than the 150° estimate I initially worked with. Below you'll find charts, formulas and links to calculators other people have provided to help determine the correct tuning length. These tools provide only estimates. Perfect tuning requires either luck or trial and error. One trial and error approach would be a temporary clamped-on resonator pipe that could easily be resized, and then replaced with welded pipe once the optimal tuning was determined. Fortunately tuning doesn't have to be perfect to do a decent job. I haven't seen one report of anyone trying this with estimated tuning and not realizing improvement. |
Drone. It's easy to find information, misinformation and speculation about the cause of exhaust drone on the internet. After a lot of reading I concluded that the drone in my system was caused by resonance of exhaust gas within the tailpipe. This occurs when the tailpipe is effectively tuned to resonate at a certain frequency, similar to a pipe in an organ. The tuning is determined primarily by the length of the pipe. Whenever the engine speed reaches the RPM which produces the "tuned" frequency a resonance occurs within the pipe exaggerating that sound. The actual resonant frequency can change somewhat depending on the temperature and composition of the exhaust gas. The sound level will also depend on the exhaust flow (a function of throttle opening in addition to RPM). On some vehicles the resonance may be amplified by sympathetic vibration of the exhaust pipe. Whether this happens can depend on the mass of the pipe, the position and stiffness of its mounts and again on temperature. In some cases the floor and/or interior of a vehicle can also resonate at the same frequency making the problem even worse. I think those other factors are usually secondary. I believe controlling the resonance of the exhaust gas within the pipe is the most important factor in curing drone. I have a further theory that the drone frequency may actually be determined not simply by the length of the tailpipe alone but also the length of the final muffler chamber (or chambers) in combination with the tailpipe. Connected together I believe they may form one (or more) longer effective chamber(s). This would explain why the frequency of my drone was lowered when switching from the MagnaFlow to the Quiet Flow muffler. I haven't been able to verify this, but I believe the final chamber in the Quiet Flow may be longer than the one in the MagnaFlow. This theory may also explain why my drone band is so wide, i.e., potentially there are effectively two or three of these combined "chambers", each resonating at a slightly different frequency. Side Branch Resonator. A side branch resonator is a simple approach for eliminating low frequency exhaust drone. (This principle is used on a few original equipment exhaust systems, very large stationary engines, and also on engine intake systems.)
The tuned length is equal to 1/4 wavelength of the target frequency. This means the reflected wave is 1/2 wavelength out of phase with the primary exhaust wave which results in cancellation. Seems like magic but it’s actually physics. There is some approximation involved with the tuning, since it depends on the speed of sound within the resonator and that is dependent on the composition of the exhaust gas and operating temperature, which can usually only be estimated. The resonator tube size does not need to be the full diameter of the main exhaust pipe. There is some reduction in effectiveness using a somewhat smaller diameter tube for the resonator but it will still remove most of the drone. With Different Converter or Muffler. I listed the exact catalytic converter and muffler I am using because I am very satisfied with my current setup. Many people have successfully applied side branch resonators to cure drone using a variety of exhaust components. So there is no reason you could not do the same with the smaller (louder) 94009 converter that Kolak usually supplies. You would simply have to tune the resonator for the actual drone occurring with that setup. It could also work with a different muffler, but finding space to install the resonator might be a challenge. Credit. Primary credit for sharing this concept should go to Graham at the Mustang corral.net forum who pioneered and wrote about it back in 2004. Lots of others also deserve credit for sharing their experience. All I've done is put all the useful information I've found together on one page. Also credit to Keith's Muffler and Brakes in Westland, Michigan for the fabrication and installation. |
|
Side Branch Resonator Tuning Notes and Sources.Approximate
(maybe a bit too
short)
1/4 wave resonator length to cancel 8 cylinder drone
|
*Well not "exactly". I'm afraid the guy who wrote what I'm quoting is guilty of false precision. He's using really precise values (lots of decimal places), even though the margin of error may actually be ±5% due to other factors. I think the length calculated with his formula also may be a bit too long, but is likely more accurate than the simple chart at the top of these notes. The perfect tuning length depends upon the actual gas temperature and composition, which we don't know for certain. So the charts and formulas above are only estimates of what might work best. They should be pretty close though. The calculators linked to below may help provide better estimates if you have better data. |
Finally. It took
some time to put this write-up together, but nowhere near as
much as it took trying to get an exhaust I could live with.
Without members of
a couple of internet forums sharing their successes on other
vehicles, it might not have happened at all. So this is for any other Jeep Grand Cherokee owners and others out there who might be in the same situation. |